Ocorrência de eventos adversos após o uso da vacina adsorvida difteria, tétano e pertussis (acelular) - dTpa -, São Paulo, SP, 2015-2016 / Aparecimiento de eventos adversos después del uso de la vacuna adsorbida difteria, tétanos y tosferina (acelular) - dTpa -, São Paulo, SP, Brasil, 2015-2016 / Adverse event occurrence following use of tetanus, diphtheria and acellular pertussis adsorbed vaccine - Tdap -, São Paulo, SP, Brazil, 2015-2016

Objetivo: descrever a ocorrência de eventos adversos pós-vacinação (EAPV) com a vacina dTpa durante a gestação. Métodos: estudo descritivo, com dados de relatos das participantes de estudo de efetividade e imunogenicidade realizado em dois hospitais de São Paulo, SP, Brasil, entre 2015 e 2016. Resultados: das 201 mães incluídas no estudo, 48 (23,9%) apresentaram pelo menos um EAPV; foram identificados 60 sintomas relacionados ao uso da dTpa - dor (22,4%), inchaço (2,5%), febre (1,5%), sono (1,0%), vermelhidão (0,5%), vômito (0,5%), dor de cabeça (0,5%), reação local (0,5%) e cansaço (0,5%); não foram registrados eventos adversos raros, muito raros ou extremamente raros; todos os eventos foram considerados esperados e estão descritos em bula; todos tiveram desfecho para cura sem sequelas. Conclusão: a dTpa, na forma adotada pelo Programa Nacional de Imunizações (PNI), é segura; não foram identificados eventos adversos inesperados entre as gestantes imunizadas com a vacina.

Objetivo: describir el aparecimiento de eventos adversos posvacunación (EAPV) con la vacuna dTpa durante el embarazo. Métodos: estudio descriptivo con datos de relatos de las participantes del estudio de efectividad e inmunogenicidad realizado en dos hospitales de São Paulo, SP, Brasil, entre 2015 y 2106. Resultados: de las 201 madres del estudio, 48 (23,9%) tuvieron al menos un EAPV; se identificaron 60 síntomas relacionados al uso de dTpa - dolor (22.4%), hinchazón (2.5%), fiebre (1.5%), somnolencia (1.0%), enrojecimiento (0.5%), vómitos (0.5 %), dolor de cabeza (0.5%), reacción local (0.5%) y cansancio (0.5%) -; no se informaron eventos adversos raros, muy raros o extremadamente raros; todos los eventos se consideraron esperados y se describen en el prospecto; todos tuvieron resultados curativos sin secuelas. Conclusión: el estudio mostró que la vacuna dTpa utilizada por el Programa Nacional de Inmunización (PNI) es segura y no se identificaron eventos adversos inesperados entre las mujeres embarazadas vacunadas.

Objective: to describe occurrence of adverse events following immunization (AEFI) with Tdap vaccine during pregnancy. Methods: this was a descriptive study using data from reports by participants in an effectiveness and immunogenicity study conducted in two hospitals in São Paulo, SP, Brazil, from 2015 to 2016. Results: of the 201 mothers included in the study, 48 (23.9%) had at least one AEFI; 60 symptoms related to Tdap use were identified - pain (22.4%), swelling (2.5%), fever (1.5%), somnolence (1.0%), redness (0.5%), vomiting (0.5%), headache (0.5%), local reaction (0.5%), and fatigue (0.5%); no rare, very rare, or extremely rare adverse events were reported; all events were considered to be expected, as they are described in the vaccine package insert; outcome of all events was recovery without sequelae. Conclusion: Tdap vaccine in the form adopted by the National Immunization Program is safe; no unexpected adverse events were identified among vaccinated pregnant women.

Immunogenicity and safety of a pentavalent diphtheria, tetanus, acellular pertussis, inactivated poliovirus, haemophilus influenzae type b conjugate combination vaccine (pentaxim™) with hepatitis B vaccine.

Objective: To obtain immunogenicity and safety data for a pentavalent combination vaccine (diphtheria, tetanus, acellular pertussis, inactivated poliovirus, Hib polysaccharide-conjugate). Design: Multicenter, open, Phase III clinical study. A DTaP-IPV//PRP~T vaccine (PentaximTM) was given at 6,10,14 weeks of age; and Hepatitis B vaccine at 0,6,14 or at 6,10,14 weeks of age. Immunogenicity assessed 1 month post-3rd dose; safety assessed for 30 minutes by the investigator, then by parents and investigators to 8 days and 30 days post-vaccination. Setting: Tertiary-care hospitals. Participants/patients: 226 healthy Indian infants (6 weeks of age). Main outcome measures: Immunogenicity and safety. Results: Immunogenicity was high for each vaccine antigen, and similar to a historical control study (France) following a 2,3,4 month of age administration schedule. Post-3rd dose, 98.6% of subjects had anti-PRP ³0.15 mg/mL and 90.0% had titers ³1.0 mg/mL; the anti-PRP GMT was 4.1 µg/mL. Seroprotection rates for diphtheria and tetanus (³0.01 IU/mL) were 99.1% and 100%; and 100%,99.1% and 100%, for polio types 1,2 and 3 (³8 [1/dil]) respectively. Anti-polio GMTs were 440.5,458.9, and 1510.7 (1/dil) for types 1,2 and 3 respectively. The vaccine response rates to pertussis antigens (4-fold increase in antibody concentration) were 93.7% for PT and 85.7% for FHA; the 2-fold increase was 97.1% and 92.4%. Vaccine reactogenicity was low with adverse reaction incidence not increasing with subsequent doses. Conclusion: The DTaP-IPV//PRP~T vaccine, given concomitantly with monovalent hepatitis B vaccine, was highly immunogenic at 6, 10 and 14 weeks of age in infants in India. The vaccine was well tolerated.

Acellular and "low" pertussis vaccines: adverse events and the role of mutations / Vacinas pertussis acelular e pertussis "low": eventos adversos e o papel das mutações

Objective: to discuss the current PAHO recommendation that does not support the substitution of traditional cellular DTP vaccine by acellular DTP, and the role of mutations, in humans, as the main cause of rare adverse events, such as epileptic-like convulsions, triggered by pertussis vaccine. Data review: the main components related to toxic effects of cellular pertussis vaccines are the lipopolysaccharide of bacterial cell wall and pertussis toxin. The removal of part of lipopolysaccharide layer has allowed the creation of a safer cellular pertussis vaccine, with costs comparable to the traditional cellular vaccine, and which may be a substitute for the acellular vaccine. Conclusion: The new methodology introduced by Instituto Butantan allows for the development of a new safer pertussis vaccine with low LPS content (Plow), and the use of the lipopolysaccharide obtained in the process in the production of monophosphoryl lipid A. This component has shown potent adjuvant effect when administered together with influenza inactivated vaccine, making possible to reduce the antigen dose, enhancing the production capacity and lowering costs.

Objetivo: Discutir as recomendações da WHO-OPAS que não consideram indicada a substituição da vacina DTP celular clássica pela DTP acelular e o papel de mutações, em humanos, como principal causa dos raros eventos de convulsões epileptiformes desencadeadas pela vacina pertussis. Revisão dos dados: Os principais componentes relacionados aos efeitos tóxicos da vacina pertussis celular são o lipopolissacarídio da parede celular da bactéria e a toxina pertussis. A remoção de parte da camada lipopolissacarídica permitiu a criação de uma vacina pertussis celular, mais segura e de custo comparável ao da vacina celular tradicional, podendo substituir a vacina pertussis acelular. Conclusão: A nova vacina pertussis, com baixo teor de LPS (Plow) desenvolvida pelo Instituto Butantan, além de oferecer uma vacina mais segura, permite o aproveitamento do lipopolissacarídeo para a produção de monofosforil lipídeo A. Esse componente mostrou-se potente como adjuvante e altamente eficiente quando administrado com a vacina de influenza, levando à possibilidade de se reduzir a dose de antígeno, aumentando a capacidade de produção e redução dos custos.

Comparative study of the reactogenicity of a three-component acellular pertussis vaccine and whole-cell pertussis vaccine administered to healthy Singaporean infants.

The objective of this study was to assess and compare the reactogenicity of GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) Biologicals' diphtheria-tetanus-tricomponent acellular pertussis vaccine (DTPa) and the locally used combined diphtheria-tetanus-whole-cell pertussis vaccine (DTPw) as a primary vaccination course in healthy infants at the age of 3, 4 and 5 months. A phase IV, single-blinded, randomized comparative clinical study involved one hundred and eighty healthy infants with two study groups in a 2:1 ratio to receive either DTPa or DTPw vaccine which were administered intramuscularly at the right anterior-lateral aspect of the thigh. The incidence and intensity of local solicited symptoms such as pain, redness and swelling at injection site and general solicited symptoms such as fever and fussiness were evaluated. Serious adverse events were followed for one month after each vaccination. The overall incidence of local and general symptoms was significantly higher in the group receiving locally used DTPw vaccine as compared to the group receiving GSK DTPa vaccine. Solicited local symptoms, pain (47.4% vs 15.1%), redness (95.9% vs 84.9%) and swelling (46.2% vs 18.5%), were reported more frequently in the group receiving DTPw vaccine than in the group receiving DTPa vaccine. Fever (> or = 37.5 degrees C) (52% vs 14.6%) and fussiness (60.8% vs 33.6%) were also more commonly reported in the DTPw group. There were six serious adverse events reported (4 with DTPw and 2 with DTPa). None of them related to the study vaccines, as considered by the investigators. Thus it was found that GSK Biologicals' DTPa vaccine was significantly less reactogenic as compared to the locally used DTPw vaccine manufactured by Commonwealth Serum Laboratories when administered as a 3-dose primary vaccination course to healthy infants at the age of 3, 4 and 5 months in Singapore.